Plumescape

Gaussian plume explorer with AERMOD-style terrain handling

Inputs

one steady hour

Pollutant

Weather stability class

Land use

Stacks

    Hills

      Receptors

        Display

        Plan

        ground-level concentration

        3D plume

        drag to orbit

        Along-wind section

        Crosswind section

        Results

        How Plumescape works

        Plumescape is an educational screening tool. It solves a steady-state Gaussian plume for one hour of weather, so you can see how stack design, wind and stability shape a plume. It follows the structure of US EPA dispersion models, but it is not AERMOD and its results are not a regulatory assessment.

        Weather

        Pasquill–Gifford stability classes A (very unstable) to F (moderately stable). Wind at stack top uses a power-law profile with the EPA rural or urban exponents. Mixing heights default to typical daytime values for classes A–D and no lid for E–F, or you can set one.

        Plume rise

        Briggs plume rise with the buoyancy/momentum crossover temperature, gradual rise to the final height, stack-tip downwash when exit velocity is below 1.5 × wind speed, and stable-air rise from the potential-temperature gradient (0.020 K/m for E, 0.035 K/m for F). Buoyancy-induced dispersion (Δh/3.5) is added to both sigmas.

        Dispersion

        Briggs open-country or urban σy and σz curves. Concentrations include ground reflection, multiple reflections from the mixing lid, and a well-mixed limit once σz exceeds 1.6 × the mixing height. In classes A–D a plume whose final height exceeds the mixing height is treated as fully penetrating and gives no ground-level concentration, as in ISC.

        Hills

        Hills use AERMOD's two-state idea: the concentration is a weighted mix of a plume that stays level and a plume that follows the terrain. In stable air the weight comes from the critical dividing-streamline height (Hc = hill height − u/N); otherwise the two states are weighted equally. This is a simplified version of AERMOD's method.

        Comparing with WHO guidelines

        Results are 1-hour averages. Where the WHO 2021 guideline uses another averaging time, the 1-hour result is scaled for comparison: 24-hour = 0.6 × 1-hour (AERSCREEN factor), 10-minute = 1.43 × 1-hour (power law, exponent 0.2).

        Not included: building downwash, background concentrations, chemistry (NOx to NO₂), deposition, calms, and sequential hourly weather.

        Using the views